![]() |
Structural details of the 1. Front vertical and horizontal stabilisers |
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| TDB ALA-100 | TDB ALA-300 | TDB ALA-600 | TDB ALA-2000 | |
| ACCOMODATION | Crew of 12 and 50 passengers |
Crew of 16 and 80 passengers |
Crew of 16, plus 150 passengers |
Crew of 24, plus 150 passengers |
| DIMENSIONS, EXTERNAL: | ||||
| Length overall, m |
160
|
205
|
235
|
345
|
| Envelope diameter, m |
140
|
190
|
220
|
320
|
| Envelope max height, m |
56
|
70
|
88
|
125
|
| Cargo platform diameter, m |
25
|
30
|
40
|
40
|
|
PERFOMANCE(estimated):
|
||||
| Max. cargo / max number of passengers, m |
100 / 650
|
300 / 1200
|
600 / 4000
|
2 000 / 10 000
(in two level) |
| Weight of fuel, t |
40
|
80
|
190
|
450
|
| Take off weight, t |
270
|
700
|
1 340
|
5 600
|
| Esfimated production, t / km/h |
7 000
|
22 500
|
48 000
|
180 000
|
| Cruising speed, km/h |
70
|
75
|
80
|
90
|
| Range, km |
5 000
|
5 000
|
5 000
|
5 000
|
| Max level speed (H=0,5/7 km), km/h |
120 / 180
|
120 / 180
|
120 / 220
|
135 / 250
|
| Pressure ceiling, m |
7 000
|
7 000
|
7 000
|
8 500
|
Main technical and economic parameters of ALA
1. The economic efficiency of 600 t. loads thermoplan is in 5 tone higher, than for the Boieng-747 "Cargo" and in 22 t. more economic than for the helicopter "Mi-26 (20 t) or it's equivalent to the railway of BAM (it's about 3 cent of USA for 1 f/km).
2. Thermoplan's working doesn't require the big airdromes and advanced
VPP, it's quite enough the land cargo platform with the radius of about
2 diameters of aircraft for the bulk carriage or 2 diameters of cargo-hold for
sometime's carriage.
3. Thermoplan's utilization doesn't require sheds what isn't necessary
for the cigar-shaped airships, thermoplan's it's running can be effected on
the open anchor platform, what decrease for technical maintenance of aircraft.
4. The technical construction of thermoplan exceeds in 20 and more times
the similar parameters of the hard cigar-aircraft, because the power torus and
envelope are made from same unification elements. Each øïàíãîóò
of cigar-aircraft it's a new special rigging manufacturing and montage. So
the cost of thermoplan's construction is in 2-2,5 times less expensive than
the same for the herd cigar-aircraft.
5. The hot air's utilization in thermo-volume permits to resolve the problem
of the ballast (to decrease the weight of liquid or bulk cargo ballast on 70-75
% compared with the ordinary aircraft).
6. Aerodynamic quality of disc (K ad) is in 7-10 times higher in comparison
with the cigar-aircraft with the same volume, what permits to lift about
20 h of take off weight on the disk's aerodynamic, for example all mass
of fuel.
7. It's only the model of disk permits to produce the real flying constructions
for yhe aircraft with a large load (250t and more), because the cigar aircraft
for the load in 600 t. has 700 m. of a length of body, what makes it's.
| PERFOMANCE CONTENT | PAYLOAD, t | |||
| 100 t | 300 t | 600 t | 2000 t | |
| Cost of the LTA head specimen, (USD) | ||||
| Size of fleet, (units) | The data | |||
| Amortization service life, (years) | ||||
| Annual average hour's flying time, (flying hours per 1 year) | are afforded | |||
| Expences on research and development work
per 1 LTA, (USD/unit) |
||||
| Price of LTA, (USD/unit) | by the | |||
| Prime cost of flying hour (USD/hour), including: | ||||
| - depreciation | official | |||
| - salary of flight crew | ||||
| - filling gas expences | inquiry: | |||
| - fuel expences | ||||
| - ground expences | thermoplane@donet.ru | |||
| Specific capital investment to ground complex,
(USD/LTA) |
||||
| Total capital investment per 1 LTA, (USD/LTA) | ||||
| Prime cost of 1 t-km, (USD/t-km) (k3=1) | ||||
| Expences on 1 flying hour (USD/f. hour). | ||||